Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales

Poole, Keith T.·1998·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

This paper develops a procedure for estimating the basic dimensions underlying a set of issue or attribute scales. A simple Hinich-Ordeshook spatial theory of voting is used to model Converse's fundamental insight that individuals' positions on issues are bundled together, and the knowledge of one or two issue positions makes the remaining positions very predictable. The model assumes that individuals' positions on a set issue or attribute dimensions are determined by the individuals' positions on a small number of underlying evaluative or basic dimensions. The procedure developed in this paper for estimating these basic dimensions is, in effect, a method of performing singular value decomposition of a matrix with missing elements. Monte Carlo testing shows that the procedure reliably reproduces the missing elements. Because of this reliability, the estimation procedure can be used to produce Eckart-Young matrix lower rank approximations. A number of applications to political data are...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2991737

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Poole, K. T.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998-07
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
954
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102470010
Cited by
467
References
1
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991737
The paper
Poole, K. T. (1998). Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991737

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.