The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable
Abstract
Researchers typically analyze time-series-cross-section data with a binary dependent \nvariable (BTSCS) using ordinary logit or probit. However, BTSCS observations are \nlikely to violate the independence assumption of the ordinary logit or probit statistical \nmodel. It is well known that if the observations are temporally related that the results of \nan ordinary logit or probit analysis may be misleading. In this paper, we provide a simple \ndiagnostic for temporal dependence and a simple remedy. Our remedy is based on the \nidea that BTSCS data are identical to grouped duration data. This remedy does not require \nthe BTSCS analyst to acquire any further methodological skills, and it can be easily \nimplemented in any standard statistical software package. While our approach is suitable \nfor any type of BTSCS data, we provide examples and applications from the field of \nInternational Relations, where BTSCS data are frequently used. We use our methodology \nto reassess Oneal and Russett's (1997) findings regarding the relationship between economic \ninterdependence, democracy, and peace. Our analyses show that (1) their finding \nthat economic interdependence is associated with peace is an artifact of their failure to \naccount for temporal dependence yet (2) their finding that democracy inhibits conflict is \nupheld even taking duration dependence into account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x · Cited by 1,369
Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis
Cederman, L.-E., Wimmer, A., & Min, B. (2010) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887109990219 · Cited by 1,346
Sensitivity Analysis of Empirical Results on Civil War Onset
Hegre, H., & Sambanis, N. (2006) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002706289303 · Cited by 1,286
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1260
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083620364
- Cited by
- 2,471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 103.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991857
- The paper
- Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.