Cited by 1,651Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates

Open access
Delsuc, Frédéric, Brinkmann, Henner, Chourrout, Daniel, Philippe, Hervé·2006·Nature

Abstract

Tunicates or urochordates (appendicularians, salps and sea squirts), cephalochordates (lancelets) and vertebrates (including lamprey and hagfish) constitute the three extant groups of chordate animals. Traditionally, cephalochordates are considered as the closest living relatives of vertebrates, with tunicates representing the earliest chordate lineage. This view is mainly justified by overall morphological similarities and an apparently increased complexity in cephalochordates and vertebrates relative to tunicates. Despite their critical importance for understanding the origins of vertebrates, phylogenetic studies of chordate relationships have provided equivocal results. Taking advantage of the genome sequencing of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica, we assembled a phylogenomic data set of 146 nuclear genes (33,800 unambiguously aligned amino acids) from 14 deuterostomes and 24 other slowly evolving species as an outgroup. Here we show that phylogenetic analyses of this data set provide compelling evidence that tunicates, and not cephalochordates, represent the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Chordate monophyly remains uncertain because cephalochordates, albeit with a non-significant statistical support, surprisingly grouped with echinoderms, a hypothesis that needs to be tested with additional data. This new phylogenetic scheme prompts a reappraisal of both morphological and palaeontological data and has important implications for the interpretation of developmental and genomic studies in which tunicates and cephalochordates are used as model animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04336

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., & Philippe, H.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Philippe, Hervé
Venue
Nature
Published
2006-02
Volume
439
Issue
7079
Pages
965-968
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2009371644
Cited by
1,651
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 93
FWCI
63.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
tunicates, cephalochordates, amphioxus, vertebrate origin, chordate phylogeny, appendicularians, Oikopleura dioica, deuterostomes, Echinodermata, nuclear gene phylogeny, model organisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Phylogeny, Urochordata, Vertebrates, Likelihood Functions, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review