Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 910

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

One Degree of Freedom for Non-Additivity

Tukey, John W.·1949·Biometrics
DOI 10.2307/3001938
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

TN DISCUSSING the possible shortcomings of the analysis of variance, much attention has been paid to non-constancy and non-normality of the error contribution. (The recent papers in Biometrics by Eisenhart [4], Cochran [3] and Bartlett [1] discuss these matters and give references.) The present writer is usually much more concerned with and worried about non-additivity, and until recently has suffered from the lack of a systematic way to seek it out, and then to measure it. (Conversations with Frederick F. Stephan have contributed greatly to this development and presentation.) The purpose of the present paper is to indicate such a way, when the data is in the form of a row-by-column table. (The professional practitioner of the analysis of variance will have no difficulty in extending the process to more complex designs.) We shall show how to isolate one degree of freedom from the residue, error, 'interaction' or 'discrepance, call it what you will. There are two known situations to which this single degree of freedom is expected to react by swelling:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3001938

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tukey, J. W.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1949-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
232
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/3001938
OpenAlex
W2316025483
Cited by
910
References
0
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.