Cited by 549Service and Product InnovationCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyManagement and Organizational Studies

Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience

Chandler, Jennifer D., Lusch, Robert F.·2015·Journal of Service Research

Abstract

The proposed framework sheds light on the fundamental role that value propositions play in service systems. Building on service-dominant logic from marketing and structuration theory from sociology, the authors theoretically link three service constructs: value propositions as invitations from actors to one another to engage in service, engagement as alignment of connections and dispositions, and service experience as many-to-many engagement. The proposed framework generates future research directions and theory development regarding the crucial role of value propositions in service systems; ultimately, it contributes to a deeper understanding of markets that is different than that which is guided by the standard neoclassical economics view of markets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094670514537709

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Chandler, Jennifer D.
Venue
Journal of Service Research
Published
2014-06-08
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
6-22
ISSN
  • 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7379
OpenAlex
W1986015197
Cited by
549
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
110.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
service systems, value proposition, service-dominant logic, structuration theory, service engagement, service experience, critique of neoclassical economics, service market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review