The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research
Abstract
In this article I develop a framework for thinking about the research interview, and I critique dominating neopositivist and romantic views on the interview. I suggest eight metaphors that offer reconceptualizations of the interview, drawing upon recent theoretical trends on language, the subject, and discourse, and develop a reflexive theoretical framework. The article provides new ways of dealing with interviews, along with implications for fieldwork interaction with subjects, interpretations of empirical material, and research questions possible or suitable to address based on interviews.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers
Jackall, R. (1988) · International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/bf01390690 · Cited by 1,296
Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline
Grey, C. (1994) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038594028002007 · Cited by 583
Cited by
Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis
Azungah, T. (2018) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035 · Cited by 1,262
Considering quality in qualitative interviewing
Roulston, K. (2010) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794109356739 · Cited by 535
Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research
Schultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001 · Cited by 522
Counting in Qualitative Research: Why to Conduct it, When to Avoid it, and When to Closet it
Hannah, D. R., & Lautsch, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492610375988 · Cited by 282
Accounting, network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations
Mouritsen, J., & Thrane, S. (2006) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.002 · Cited by 263
Digital twins in infrastructure: definitions, current practices, challenges and strategies
Broo, D. G., & Schooling, J. (2023) · International Journal of Construction Management · doi:10.1080/15623599.2021.1966980 · Cited by 184
Elraz, H. (2018) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726717716752 · Cited by 156
Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0287 · Cited by 101
Managing Tensions and Divergent Institutional Logics in Firm–NPO Partnerships
Ahmadsimab, A., & Chowdhury, I. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04265-x · Cited by 63
A Sustainable Circular Economy: Exploring Stakeholder Interests in Finland
Marjamaa, M., Salminen, H., Kujala, J., Tapaninaho, R., & Heikkinen, A. (2021) · South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases · doi:10.1177/2277977921991914 · Cited by 62
Why are enrichment practices in zoos difficult to implement effectively?
Tuite, E. K., Moss, S. A., Phillips, C. J., & Ward, S. J. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12050554 · Cited by 22
Denning, S., Scriven, R., & Slatter, R. (2022) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2020.1815826 · Cited by 16
A shift in perspective: Examining the impact of perceived follower behavior on leaders
Gesang, E., & Süß, S. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101156 · Cited by 15
Bhatt, P., & Garikipati, S. (2024) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545701.2024.2383209 · Cited by 8
Dawson, N., & Bain, K. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2021.1966559 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvesson, M.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124503841
- Cited by
- 1,372
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 93.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
