The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740 · Cited by 2,064
U.S. Disparities in Health: Descriptions, Causes, and Mechanisms
Adler, N. E., & Rehkopf, D. H. (2008) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090852 · Cited by 1,212
Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster
Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2006) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003 · Cited by 847
Best Practices in Conceptualizing and Measuring Social Class in Psychological Research
Diemer, M. A., Mistry, R. S., Wadsworth, M. E., López, I., & Reimers, F. (2013) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12001 · Cited by 585
Wealth Inequality and Accumulation
Killewald, A., Pfeffer, F. T., & Schachner, J. N. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053331 · Cited by 482
“Income and employment differences play key roles in explaining the gap, although female-headed households’ lower savings rates (Conley & Ryvicker 2004) and women’s investments in safer, lower-yield assets (Chang 2010, Ruel & Hauser 2013) may also contribute. As described in Part II, most surveys measure wealth at the…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, M. O., & Conley, D.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1579
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293578317
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3006189
- The paper
- Emerson, M. O., & Conley, D. (2000). Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
