Cited by 98Natural Language Processing TechniquesLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

The Process of Question Answering -- A Computer Simulation of Cognition

Open access
Colclough, Michael, Lehnert, Wendy G.·1979·The Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The processes of question answering are not a very well documented area of human intellectual activity, although our daily life is pervaded with it. According to Wendy Lehnert in a recent study on this subject this lack of insight is due to the fact that People are largely unconscious of the cognitive processes involved in answering a question, and are consequently insensitive to the complexities of those processes. But this may be true for almost any psychological activity. The maining of questions and their appropriate answers has been felt intuitively by cognitive scientist (and their predecessors) to be a conceptual swamp. Questions can be used for almost any purpose in communication: not only to obtain information or to request actions, but also to induce information (as in a Socratic dialogue, of. Collins, 1977), to change topic in a conversation and even to answer questions. One may therefore wonder whether questions form a proper conceptual category. The interpretation of a question may cover the complete area of discourse comprehension. But the production of an answer may involve even more: it may elicit any form of human cognitive processing. And, then, the truth value or appropriateness of the answer can be the subject of philosophic debate. Although Wendy Lehnert has put in her study some important restrictions to the nature of questions and to the conceptual domain they refer to (stories), she has by no means evaded the complexity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3009325

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colclough, M., & Lehnert, W. G.
Venue
The Journal of the Operational Research Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1979-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
770
ISSN
0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966542308
Cited by
98
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
  • OLAC - Open Language Archives Community (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
question answering, cognitive processes, question comprehension, discourse comprehension, Socratic dialogue, conversation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review