The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Group Decision Rules and the Rejection of Deviates
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clearly, people react negatively to those who violate cultural norms and values (e.g., Miller & Anderson, 1979; Schachter, 1951).”
From Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. (1989) · cites this paper as Miller & Anderson, 1979
In the citing paper
“Clearly, people react negatively to those who violate cultural norms and values (e.g., Miller & Anderson, 1979; Schachter, 1951).”
From A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews (1991) · cites this paper as Miller & Anderson, 1979
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308 · Cited by 1,412
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681 · Cited by 1,323
CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Markovsky, B. (1996) · Cited by 994
Social Exclusion Causes People to Spend and Consume Strategically in the Service of Affiliation
Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/656667 · Cited by 574
“…whereas similarity and conformity promote acceptance while reducing chance of rejection and ostracism (Brewer 1991; Byrne 1971; Byrne, Baskett, and Hodges 1971; Deutsch and Gerard 1955; Griskevicius et al. 2006; Levine 1989; Luo and Klohnen 2005; Miller and Anderson 1979; Schachter 1951).”
BackgroundMinority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S. R., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323 · Cited by 479
Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity.
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281 · Cited by 387
The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status and Competence from Signals of Nonconformity
Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/674870 · Cited by 346
“…to such rules and social norms is driven by a desire to gain social acceptance and status (see Cialdini and Goldstein 2004) and avoid negative sanctions such as social disapproval, ridicule, and exclusion (Kruglanski and Webster 1991; Levine 1989; Miller and Anderson 1979; Schachter 1951).”
BackgroundTanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.189 · Cited by 332
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.212 · Cited by 320
Developing "Complicated" Understanding in Administrators
Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1983.4284737 · Cited by 294
Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research
Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.007 · Cited by 218
Some social psychological effects of group decision rules.
Miller, C. E., Jackson, P., Mueller, J., & Schersching, C. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.325 · Cited by 88
Self-citationTrickle-Round Signals: When Low Status Is Mixed with High
Bellezza, S., & Berger, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz049 · Cited by 86
Distance and Alternative Signals of Status: A Unifying Framework
Bellezza, S. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucac049 · Cited by 86
“Being associated with an undesired or marginalized group can lead to social disapproval, exclusion, or a host of other negative consequences (Miller and Anderson 1979).”
BackgroundDoing what the mob do: priming effects on conformity
Pendry, L. F., & Carrick, R. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.33 · Cited by 41
The Origins and Consequences of Consensus Decision Making: A Test of the Social Consensus Model
Sager, K. L., & Gastil, J. (2006) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/10417940500503464 · Cited by 34
“For example, Miller and Anderson (1979) investigated the effects of a confederate’s opposition to the alternative preferred by the majority and three decision rules (dictatorship rule, majority rule, and unanimity rule) on group members’ average level of satisfaction with the decision.”
BackgroundSmith, C. M., Dykema‐Engblade, A., Walker, A., Niven, T. S., & McGough, T. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003004004 · Cited by 27
“This effect is exacerbated when group members are highly interdependent (Berkowitz & Howard, 1959) and when the minority is perceived as being responsible for the group’s failure ( Jones & deCharms, 1957; Miller & Anderson, 1979).”
BackgroundLevine, J. M., Alexander, K., & Hansen, T. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.003.0024 · Cited by 23
Group Reaction to Defection: The Impact of Shared Reality
Mannetti, L., Levine, J. M., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.447 · Cited by 20
Married and cohabiting parents’ well-being
Stavrova, O., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2014) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514541072 · Cited by 19
“Survey and experimental research has shown that violations of social norms are linked to social disapproval and rejection (Fehr & Gächter, 2002; Hechter & Opp, 2001; Kruglanski & Webster, 1991; Levine, 1989; Miller & Anderson, 1979).”
BackgroundGame assessment: fun as well as effective
Desrochers, M. N., Pusateri, M. J., & Fink, H. C. (2007) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930601116789 · Cited by 16
Emergent Decision-Making Practices In Technology-Supported Self-Organizing Distributed Teams
Heckman, R., Crowston, K., Li, Q., Allen, E. E., Eseryel, U. Y., Howison, J., & Wie, K. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 14
Benevolent Conformity: The Influence of Perceived Motives on Judgments of Conformity
Wice, M., & Davidai, S. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220963702 · Cited by 15
“…(e.g., Bellezza et al., 2014; Stamkou et al., 2018; van Kleef et al., 2011, 2012), are tolerant toward slight deviations from the majority opinion (Miller & Anderson, 1979), and hold in high regard those who resist social influence (Cialdini et al., 1974), exert willpower to break from accepted…”
BackgroundThe influence of spokesperson choice and product newness on consumer purchase intention
Liu, F., Wei, H., Sun, Z., Zhu, Z. A., & Chen, H. A. (2024) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-03-2023-0098 · Cited by 10
Smith, C. M. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.423 · Cited by 9
Wien, A. H., Peluso, A. M., Pichierri, M., Piper, L., & Guido, G. (2023) · Italian Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1007/s43039-023-00088-x · Cited by 7
“This would help them achieve certain intangible rewards, in terms of group acceptance and social inclusion (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004), and avoid penalties, in terms of social disapproval, rejection, and ridicule (Miller & Anderson, 1979).”
Thirty-one Years of Group Research in Social Psychology Quarterly (1975–2005)
Harrod, W. J., Welch, B. K., & Kushkowski, J. D. (2009) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 6
Parida, B., & Gupta, V. (2017) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-017-0410-1 · Cited by 5
When Private Reporting Is More Positive Than Public Reporting
Strosser, G. L., Jonason, P. K., Lawson, R., Reid, A. N., & Vittum-Jones, A. W. (2016) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000267 · Cited by 3
Group Maintenance Behaviors in the Decision-Making Styles of Self-Organizing Distributed Teams
Scialdone, M., Li, Q., Crowston, K., & Heckman, R. (2009) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Groups in Transition: Differences in the Context of Social Change
Prišlin, R., Davenport, C. T., & Michalak, J. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9781444390841.ch10 · Cited by 1
Does Conforming Make Us More Liked? Perceptions of Conformist and Non-conformist Behaviour
Leone, T. (2010) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Social identity in close relationships
Moses, J. F. (2014) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Impacts of implicit normative evaluations on stereotyping and prejudice
Yoshida, E. (2009) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 1
Too Good to Be True: Imperfection as a Signal of AuthenticityPreprint
Bhattacharjee, A., Barasch, A., & Wertenbroch, K. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3233792 · Cited by 1
Regulatory Fit and Reaction to Opinion Deviance in Small Groups
Alexander, K. (2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Me, Myself, Fairness, and I: On the Self-Related Aspects of Fairness Reactions
Loseman, A. (2004) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Symbolic Consumption and Alternative Signals of Status
Bellezza, S. (2015) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
McLuckie, S. (2017) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University)
Imhoff, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17125-3_18-1
Imhoff, R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48129-1_18
The effects of conformity preferences in voting
Ding, H. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1c14cbbczdbbaz4187z9d33zdde1b6e379fd
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, C. E., & Anderson, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 354
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332232071
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- group decision making, social influence, conformity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
