Cited by 43Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Group Decision Rules and the Rejection of Deviates

Miller, Charles E., Anderson, Patricia Doede·1979·Social Psychology Quarterly

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3033805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Miller, C. E., & Anderson, P. D.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
1979-12
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
354
ISSN
0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332232071
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
group decision making, social influence, conformity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review