Cited by 144Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

Ambiguity and Bias in the Self-Concept

Felson, Richard B.·1981·Social Psychology Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3033866

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People believe they are better than average on a wide variety of dimensions.

    “Perhaps as a consequence of this downward comparison process, people believe they are better than average on a wide variety of dimensions (Felson, 1981).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felson, R. B.
Corresponding author
Felson, Richard B.
Venue
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
1981-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
64
ISSN
0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316189228
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
self-concept, ambiguity, bias, self-perception, self-knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review