Cited by 761Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability.

Dunning, David, Meyerowitz, Judith A., Holzberg, Amy D.·1989·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082

Cites

790 of 790 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research on self-serving biases and biased processing suggests that the bias results from selective information processing.

    “Prior research on self-serving biases (Dunning, Meyerowitz and Holzberg, 1989), and on biased processing of information in general (Darley and Gross, 1983), suggests that the bias results from selective information processing.”

    From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Dunning, Meyerowitz and Holzberg, 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 792 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1989-12
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1082-1090
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2017483422
Cited by
758
References
792
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-assessment, self-serving bias, trait definitions, ambiguity, ability assessment, self-concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review