Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,150

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medicine, Rationality, and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective

Morgan, Lynn M., Good, Byron J.·1995·The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

Preface 1. Medical anthropology and the problem of belief 2. Illness representations in medical anthropology: a reading of the field 3. How medicine constructs its objects 4. Semiotics and the study of medical reality 5. The body, illness experience, and the lifeworld: a phenomenological account of chronic pain 6. The narrative representation of illness 7. Aesthetics, rationality and medical anthropology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3034282

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,150

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, L. M., & Good, B. J.
Venue
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
212
ISSN
1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026560489
Cited by
1,150
References
0
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medicine, Rationality, and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3034282
The paper
Morgan, L. M., & Good, B. J. (1995). Medicine, Rationality, and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.