TECHNOLOGY SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN WINNER-TAKE-ALL MARKETS: THE IMPACT OF LEARNING ORIENTATION, TIMING, AND NETWORK EXTERNALITIES.
Abstract
In industries characterized by network externalities, a single technology standard often rises to dominance, locking out competing technologies. This research demonstrates that despite “path depend...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In nascent multi-platform settings, due to the ongoing battle for market dominance and the potential for a winner-take-all outcome, complementors are likely to seek market signals that help them assess which platform(s) have a higher potential to outperform their rivals.
“In nascent multi-platform settings, due to the ongoing battle for market dominance among platforms and the potential for a winner-take-all outcome (Schilling 2002), complementors are likely to seek market signals that help them assess which platform(s) have a higher potential to outperform their rivals.”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Schilling 2002
Multihoming can shield complementors against the risk of a platform's market failure.
“and by shielding against the risk of a platform's market failure (Schilling 2002)”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Schilling 2002
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 663
- Authors
- Schilling, M. A.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schilling, M. A.
- ORCID
- Schilling, M. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 387-398
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2027039996
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 52.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- winner-take-all markets, network effects, learning orientation, technology standards, path dependence, technological lock-in
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
