The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Lean Startup Framework: Closing the Academic–Practitioner Divide
Shepherd, D. A., & Gruber, M. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719899415 · Cited by 459
From Scarcity to Abundance: Scholars and Scholarship in an Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Grimes, M., von Krogh, G., Feuerriegel, S., Rink, F., & Gruber, M. (2023) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2023.4006 · Cited by 180
Sustainable Change in the Public Sector: The Longitudinal Benefits of Organization Development
Wayne Boss, R., Dunford, B. B., Boss, A. D., & McConkie, M. L. (2010) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886310387087 · Cited by 22
Management Control Research and the Management of Uncertainty: Rethinking Knowledge in Management
Saulpic, O., & Zarlowski, P. (2014) · Management Control and Uncertainty · doi:10.1057/9781137392121_14 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Daft, R. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 340-355
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W4233682942
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3069460
- The paper
- Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Daft, R. L. (2001). ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE: KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER BETWEEN PRACTITIONERS AND ACADEMICS. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
