Cited by 1Second Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Acquisition and Education

Inter-Level Articulation: Toward a Process-Focused Model for Russian Language Programs

Garza, Thomas J., Watzke, John L.·1997·The Slavic and East European Journal

Abstract

Thomas J. Garza, John L. Watzke, Inter-Level Articulation: Toward a Process-Focused Model for Russian Language Programs, The Slavic and East European Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2 (Summer, 1997), pp. 303-320

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/309739

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Garza, T. J., & Watzke, J. L.
Venue
The Slavic and East European Journal
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
303
ISSN
0037-6752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W186641162
Cited by
1
References
25
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Slavic and East European Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Acquisition and Education
Keywords
language curriculum design, language proficiency levels, foreign language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review