The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns in the Socioeconomic Characteristics of Women Obtaining Abortions in 2000-2001
Abstract
CONTEXT: Information about the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in the United States can help policymakers and family planning providers determine which groups of women need better access to contraceptive services. METHODS: A representative sample of more than 10,000 women obtaining abortions from a stratified probability sample of 100 U.S. providers were surveyed in 2000-2001; survey data are used to examine the demographic characteristics of women who terminate pregnancies. This information, along with other national-level data, is used to estimate abortion rates and ratios for subgroups of women and examine recent changes in these measures. RESULTS. In 2000, 21 out of every 1,000 women of reproductive age had an abortion. Women who are aged 18-29, unmarried, black or Hispanic, or economically disadvantaged-including those on Medicaid-have higher abortion rates. The overall abortion rate decreased by 11% between 1994 and 2000. The decline was greatest for 15-17-year-olds, women in the highest income category, those with college degrees and those with no religious affiliation. Abortion rates for women with incomes below 200% of poverty and for women with Medicaid coverage increased between 1994 and 2000. The rate of decline in abortion among black and Hispanic adolescents was lower than that among white adolescents, and the abortion rate among poor teenagers increased substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Increased efforts are needed to help both adolescent women and adult women of all economic statuses avoid unintended pregnancies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Self-citationAiles, E. C., Simeone, R. M., Dawson, A. L., Petersen, E. E., & Gilboa, S. M. (2016) · Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.23573 · Cited by 112
O'Donnell, L., Agronick, G., Duran, R., Myint‐U, A., & Stueve, A. (2009) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/4108409 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 226
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027014678
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns in the Socioeconomic Characteristics of Women Obtaining Abortions in 2000-2001. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3097821
- The paper
- Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Patterns in the Socioeconomic Characteristics of Women Obtaining Abortions in 2000-2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.