Cited by 49Educational Theory and Curriculum StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation Pedagogy and Practices

Opportunities to Learn and Student Diversity: Prospects and Pitfalls of a Common Core Curriculum

McPartland, James M., Schneider, Barbara·1996·Sociology of Education

Abstract

James M. McPartland, Barbara Schneider, Opportunities to Learn and Student Diversity: Prospects and Pitfalls of a Common Core Curriculum, Sociology of Education, Vol. 69, Extra Issue: Special Issue on Sociology and Educational Policy: Bringing Scholarship and Practice Together (1996), pp. 66-81

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3108456

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McPartland, J. M., & Schneider, B.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Sociology of Education
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996
Volume
69
Pages
66
ISSN
0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991282549
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
common core curriculum, student diversity, curriculum standardization, education policy, curriculum reform, educational equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review