Cited by 53School Choice and PerformanceMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesCritical Race Theory in Education

Hidden Disparities: How Courses and Curricula Shape Opportunities in Mathematics During High School

Open access
Schiller, Kathryn S., Schmidt, William H., Muller, Chandra, Houang, Richard T.·2010·Equity & Excellence in Education

Abstract

Efforts to promote academic achievement by increasing access to courses, especially in mathematics, may mask educational disparities if variations in curriculum are not also monitored. A multi-dimensional description of students' mathematics curricula during high school was obtained from analyses of surveys, transcripts, and textbooks collected for a nationally representative study of adolescents during the mid-1990s. Few gaps in the number of years or credits in mathematics coursework were found. However, the quantity and cognitive challenge of instructional materials in textbooks adopted for those courses differed significantly both across and within mathematics tracks. Differences in the quality of curriculum accumulating during high school were also related to parents' education level. Reducing such gaps in learning opportunities would require teachers to supplement adopted instructional materials to ensure that all students receive a high quality mathematics curriculum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10665684.2010.517062

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students who underperform in or opt out of rigorous coursework are far less likely to leave secondary school prepared for college or university or for advanced courses in college or university.

    “When such students underperform in or opt out of rigorous coursework, they are far less likely to leave secondary school prepared for college or university or for advanced courses in college or university8,9.”

    From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The ‘Course Enrollments as Opportunities to Learn’ section (page unavailable) says that mathematics course sequencing affects how far students progress in high school and that mathematics success has consequences for post-secondary schooling. The ‘Dimensions of Learning Opportunities’ section (page unavailable) also discusses undergraduates’ need for remedial courses. But the paper does not establish that students who underperform in or opt out of rigorous coursework are ‘far less likely’ to leave school prepared for college or advanced college courses. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The rigor of mathematics courses taken in high school strongly predicts later educational attainment.

    “the rigor of mathematics courses taken in high school strongly predicts later educational attainment8,9”

    From A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The ‘Course Enrollments as Opportunities to Learn’ section says mathematics success has consequences for post-secondary schooling and that colleges would view graduates with different mathematics course sequences differently. But the Results examine learning opportunities during high school, not whether course rigor strongly predicts later educational attainment. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Callahan RM 2005 Tracking and high school English learners: Limited opportunities to learn American Education Research Journal 42 2 305 328
  2. Floden RE 2002 The measurement of opportunity to learn Porter AC Gamoran A Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement 231 266 Washington, DC National Academies Press
  3. Hudson RA Lahann PE Lee JS 2010 Considerations in the review and adoption of mathematics textbooks Reys BJ Reys RE Rubenstien R Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends, and future direction 213 229 Seventy-Second Yearbook Reston, VA National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  4. Schmidt WH McKnight CC Houang RT Wang H Wiley DE Cogan LS Wolfe RG 2001 Why schools matter: Examining cross-national comparisons of curriculum and learning San Francisco Jossey-Bass

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiller, K. S., Schmidt, W. H., Muller, C., & Houang, R. T.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Equity & Excellence in Education
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
414-433
ISSN
  • 1066-5684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3457
OpenAlex
W2043347006
Cited by
53
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Equity & Excellence in Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD031921, R01HD040428)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
mathematics curriculum, educational inequality, mathematics achievement, mathematics textbooks, teaching materials, parental education, course credits, educational equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review