Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,647

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention

Eggleston, S. J., Turiel, Elliot·1985·British Journal of Educational Studies

Abstract

Preface 1. Introduction: approaches to the study of social knowledge 2. Structure and development 3. Social experience and social knowledge 4. Dimensions of social judgments 5. Rules and prohibitions 6. The development of concepts of social convention and coordination of domains 7. The development of moral judgments 8. Noncognitive approaches to moral development: internalization and biological determinism 9. Social judgments and actions: coordination of domains 10. Conclusions: interaction, development, and rationality References Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3121515

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,647

Metadata

Authors
Eggleston, S. J., & Turiel, E.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Studies
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985-06
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
186
ISSN
0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055892307
Cited by
2,647
References
0
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3121515
The paper
Eggleston, S. J., & Turiel, E. (1985). The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.