The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Industry Location Decisions: The Motor Vehicle Industry
Abstract
Air pollution policy has moved steadily toward strict uniformity of regulations across regions. In particular, amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules in the 1970s and early 1980s have promoted a policy designed to reduce regional variation in air pollution controls required of industrial polluters. This policy was based on the premise that differences in environmental regulations would promote locational competition among regions. The fear was that polluting firms would migrate to clean areas where they would be subject to less stringent regulation; thus regions that had not met the federal standards would be unable to compete for new industry and jobs, and rents to existing industry would decline as industry chose less polluted locations. This argument is consistent, for example, with Pashigian's (1985) findings that Congressional voting on the PSD (prevention of significant deterioration) legislation in the late 1970s which levelled the playing field across regions, was motivated primarily by this fear of locational competition. Hence, much of regional environmental policy has been based on the premise that many firms place a heavy weight on regional environmental policy when choosing a location. Currently, however, there is little empirical evidence on either the extent of regional variation in pollution reduction requirements or on the extent to which that variation affects industry location decisions. The issue is of critical importance because environmental policy which is uniform across regions is likely to have a high social cost, compared with one that accounts for differences in abatement costs and benefits among regions (see Baumol and Oates 1988). In this paper we use a conditional logit model to examine the impact of a variety of county characteristics on the locations of 50 new branch plants in the motor vehicle industry during 1973-82, a period when there was still substantial variation in envi-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?
Bartik, T. J. (1991) · doi:10.17848/9780585223940 · Cited by 2,643
Greenstone, M. (2002) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/342808 · Cited by 1,122
The Effects of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment
List, J. A., & Co, C. Y. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1095 · Cited by 484
Effects of Air Quality Regulation on in Polluting Industries
Becker, R., & Henderson, V. (1997) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w6160 · Cited by 416
Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location
Brunnermeier, S. B., & Levinson, A. (2004) · The Journal of Environment & Development · doi:10.1177/1070496503256500 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- McConnell, V. D., & Schwab, R. M.
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1510567042
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Industry Location Decisions: The Motor Vehicle Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3146684
- The paper
- McConnell, V. D., & Schwab, R. M. (1990). The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Industry Location Decisions: The Motor Vehicle Industry. Land Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.