The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the Benefits of Amenity Improvements in Hedonic Price Models
Abstract
In this two volume collection the editors have chosen a sample of some of the most essential and inspirational articles and papers for understanding revealed preference methods to value environmental amenities. The papers cover the gamut of methods that are typically classified as revealed preference approaches - including: recreation demand models, hedonic methods, and averting behavior methods, as well as efforts to combine stated and revealed preferences. While this collection is far from exh
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x · Cited by 1,275
Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach
Won Kim, C., Phipps, T. T., & Anselin, L. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00013-x · Cited by 710
Does Hazardous Waste Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market and the Superfund Program*
Greenstone, M., & Gallagher, J. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.951 · Cited by 435
Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Pricing Approach,
Mahan, B. L. (1997) · doi:10.21236/ada326734 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartik, T. J.
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1549724271
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Benefits of Amenity Improvements in Hedonic Price Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3146822
- The paper
- Bartik, T. J. (1988). Measuring the Benefits of Amenity Improvements in Hedonic Price Models. Land Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
