The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon
Abstract
Concerns that the loss of habitat have greatly increased species extinction rates has led to calls for establishing biological reserves to preserve key habitat. In this paper, we study reserve site selection for terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon using data on species ranges and land values. We find cost-effective strategies that represent a maximum number of species for a given conservation budget. By varying the budget, we find the cost of obtaining various levels of representation. In general, effective conservation decision-making requires integrated analysis of both biological and economic data. (JEL Q20)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R. E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. R., & Ricketts, T. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707823105 · Cited by 1,048
Integrating economic costs into conservation planning
NAIDOO, R., BALMFORD, A., FERRARO, P., POLASKY, S., RICKETTS, T., & ROUGET, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003 · Cited by 892
Self-citationNaidoo, R., & Iwamura, T. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., & Garber-Yonts, B.
- Venue
- Land Economics
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-78
- ISSN
- 0023-7639 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2114221209
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3146981
- The paper
- Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., & Garber-Yonts, B. (2001). Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon. Land Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
