The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Researching Sensitive Topics
Abstract
PART ONE: WHAT IS SENSITIVE RESEARCH? The Problems of Researching Sensitive Topics - Raymond M Lee and Claire M Renzetti An Overview and Introduction The Ethics and Politics of Sensitive Research - Joan E Sieber PART TWO: DESIGNING RESEARCH ON SENSITIVE TOPICS The Cyclical Pattern of Child Abuse - Sharon D Herzberger A Study of Research Methodology Measuring the Underground Economy - J J Thomas A Suitable Case for Interdisciplinary Treatment? Doing Research in Post-Tiananmen China - Daniel J Curran and Sandra Cook Developing a Community Sample of Gay Men for an Epidemiological Study of AIDS - John L Martin and Laura Dean PART THREE: SENSITIVITY IN FIELD RESEARCH 'They Must Be Crazy' - Marybeth Ayella Some of the Difficulties in Researching 'Cults' Sensitivity as a Problem in Field Research - John D Brewer A Study of Routine Policing in Northern Ireland Mediating the Message - Nigel G Fielding Affinity and Hostility in Research on Sensitive Topics AIDS Prevention Research - Benjamin P Bowser and Joan E Sieber Old Problems and New Solutions PART FOUR: THE USE OF FEMINIST METHODOLOGIES IN RESEARCHING SENSITIVE TOPICS An Education in Interviewing - Rosalind Edwards Placing the Researcher and the Research Interviewing Survivors of Marital Rape - Raquel Kennedy Bergen Doing Feminist Research on Sensitive Topics Using Visual Imagery to Explore Gendered Notions of Pain - Gillian Bendelow PART FIVE: DISSEMINATING SENSITIVE RESEARCH FINDINGS: STRUCTURAL AND PERSONAL CONSTRAINTS Studying African Women's Secret Societies - Pamela J Brink Ethical Issues in Self-Censorship - Patricia A Adler and Peter Adler Ethnographic Research on Sensitive Topics Anticipating Media Coverage - Noreen L Channels Methodological Decisions in Criminal Justice Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review
Krumpal, I. (2013) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 · Cited by 2,860
The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018406069584 · Cited by 1,764
Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited
Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750510592454 · Cited by 632
Dimensions of Privacy Concern among Online Consumers
Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (2000) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.62.16949 · Cited by 607
TEN LIES OF ETHNOGRAPHY: Moral Dilemmas of Field Research
FINE, G. A. (1993) · Journal of Contemporary Ethnography · doi:10.1177/089124193022003001 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa, J. A., Renzetti, C. M., & Lee, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152138114
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 74.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Researching Sensitive Topics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3152234
- The paper
- Costa, J. A., Renzetti, C. M., & Lee, R. M. (1994). Researching Sensitive Topics. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.