The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement
Abstract
This second edition of Dr Bram Oppenheim's established work, like the first, is a practical teaching text of survey methods. The new edition has extended its scope to include interviewing (both clip-board and depth interviewing), sampling and research design, data analysis, and a special chapter on pilot work. As before, the chapters on questionnaire design are supported by further chapters on attitude scaling methods, and on projective techniques. There is refreshingly critical treatment of problems such as faulty research designs, errors in sampling, ambiguities in question wording, biases in interviewing, losses of information, and the interpretation of attitude scales and of projective data. The book is laced throughout with instructive examples from many fields, ranging from marketing surveys to the study of children's political perceptions. Problems of reliability and validity are kept to the fore. Above all, the need for pilot work is emphasized at every stage. The book is intended for graduate methodology courses in the social sciences, but it is also designed to reach other professionals, including teachers, social workers, medical researchers, and opinion pollsters, who have to evaluate or carry out social surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps
Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., & Mani, M. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3422 · Cited by 2,233
Horne, R., & Weinman, J. (1999) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00057-4 · Cited by 2,201
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2140 · Cited by 1,715
What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20801 · Cited by 1,397
A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343612 · Cited by 1,208
Metadata
- Authors
- Albuam, G., & Oppenheim, A. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987604705
- Cited by
- 4,971
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 141.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3172892
- The paper
- Albuam, G., & Oppenheim, A. N. (1993). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.