The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes
Abstract
Abstract. A conceptual model is presented as a guide to the maintenance and restoration of ecologically sustainable boreal forest. The model is based on the hypothesis that self‐sustained forest ecosystems can be (re‐)created, and their biodiversity developed, if forest management can simulate the composition and structure of boreal forest landscapes by introducing and maintaining disturbances leading to naturally dynamic spatial and temporal patterns of forest regeneration. The major explanatory variable in the model is the effect of wildfire on sites with different fuel characteristics and climates found in the European boreal forest. Four levels of fire intensity are distinguished, based on mean fire frequencies. These range from extremely low in some wet tall‐herb sites or sites at high altitudes or latitudes with a humid climate, where fire is absent or rare, to dry lichen‐rich sites where fire occurs often. The model is called ASIO, after the words Absent, Seldom, Infrequent and Often, indicating the four levels. Three main disturbance regimes are distinguished in the European boreal forest, based on the complex interactions between probabilistic (e.g. mean fire intervals at different site types) and random events (e.g. where and when a fire occurs): (1) gap‐phase Picea abies dynamics; (2) succession from young to old‐growth mixed deciduous/coniferous forest; and (3) multi‐cohort Pinus sylvestris dynamics. The model stems mainly from studies in Fennoscandia, but some studies from outside this region are reviewed to provide support for a more general application of the model. The model has been implemented in planning systems on the landscape level of several large Swedish forest enterprises, and is also used as an educational tool to help private land owners with the location and realization of forest management regimes. Finally, the model can be used to develop an administrative system for the monitoring of biodiversity in boreal forest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool
ROBERGE, J., & ANGELSTAM, P. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00450.x · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationThe forgotten stage of forest succession: early‐successional ecosystems on forest sites
Swanson, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Beschta, R. L., Crisafulli, C. M., DellaSala, D. A., Hutto, R. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Swanson, F. J. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090157 · Cited by 1,013
Conedera, M., Tinner, W., Neff, C., Meurer, M., Dickens, A. F., & Krebs, P. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.005 · Cited by 573
Bergeron, Y., Harvey, B., Leduc, A., & Gauthier, S. (1999) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc75049-1 · Cited by 300
Tree Injury and Mortality in Fires: Developing Process-Based Models
Butler, B. W., & Dickinson, M. B. (2010) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0601055 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Angelstam, P. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 593-602
- ISSN
- 1100-9233 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2048688251
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3237275
- The paper
- Angelstam, P. K. (1998). Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.