The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Stand- and forest-level considerations
Open accessAbstract
Although the concept of forest ecosystem management based on natural disturbance has generated a great deal of interest, few concrete examples exist of FEM principles being put into application. Silvicultural practices that emulate natural disturbances are proposed with examples from the principal vegetation zones of Quebec. With the exception of the large-scale use of careful logging to protect advanced regeneration in ecosystems generally controlled by fire, stand-level silvicultural practices currently used are reasonably similar to natural disturbances, although important differences exist. In contrast, at the forest-level, even-aged management, as is currently practised, rarely permits adequate reproduction of the variety of age classes, stand types, and structural components normally found in the boreal forest. A model that allows an even-aged management approach inspired by natural dynamics is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes?
Franklin, J. F. (1993) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941820 · Cited by 1,059
The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
Attiwill, P. M. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7 · Cited by 853
Fire and vegetation dynamics: studies from the North American boreal forest
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5586 · Cited by 764
The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems
Johnson, L., Wien, R. W., & MacLean, D. A. (1984) · Arctic and Alpine Research · doi:10.2307/1551180 · Cited by 654
Angelstam, P. K. (1998) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237275 · Cited by 427
Age-class distribution and the forest fire cycle
Wagner, C. E. V. (1978) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x78-034 · Cited by 425
Future wildfire in circumboreal forests in relation to global warming
Flannigan, M. D., Bergeron, Y., Engelmark, O., & Wotton, B. M. (1998) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3237261 · Cited by 306
Self-citationNutrient Cycles and H+ Budgets of Forest Ecosystems
Binkley, D., & Richter, D. D. B. (1987) · Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60086-0 · Cited by 249
The theory and use of two fire history models
Johnson, E. A., & Wagner, C. E. V. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x85-039 · Cited by 230
The history and pattern of fire in the boreal forest of southeastern Labrador
Foster, D. R. (1983) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b83-269 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Conedera, M., Tinner, W., Neff, C., Meurer, M., Dickens, A. F., & Krebs, P. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.005 · Cited by 573
Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management
McRae, D. J., Duchesne, L. C., Freedman, B., Lynham, T. J., & Woodley, S. (2001) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-010 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergeron, Y., Harvey, B., Leduc, A., & Gauthier, S.
- Venue
- The Forestry Chronicle
- Publisher
- Canadian Institute of Forestry
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-54
- ISSN
- 0015-7546 (ISSN-L)
- 1499-9315
- OpenAlex
- W2061544107
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Stand- and forest-level considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5558/tfc75049-1
- The paper
- Bergeron, Y., Harvey, B., Leduc, A., & Gauthier, S. (1999). Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Stand- and forest-level considerations. The Forestry Chronicle. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc75049-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.