The Parables of the Kingdom
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dodd's definition points to the pedagogical purpose of parables: to tease the minds of listeners into active thought.
“Dodd's definition points to the pedagogical purpose of parables: to tease the minds of listeners into active thought.”
From The pedagogy of Jesus in the parable of the Good Samaritan: A diacognitive analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Dodd (1961)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The pedagogy of Jesus in the parable of the Good Samaritan: A diacognitive analysis
Rule, P. N. (2017) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v73i3.3886 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Historical Jesus vs Chalcedonian definition: The problem of Christ's ignorance
Institute of Control Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences, & Chernyavsky, A. L. (2023) · Issues of Theology · doi:10.21638/spbu28.2023.106
- Authors
- Cadbury, H. J., & Dodd, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biblical Literature
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1936-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242
- ISSN
- 0021-9231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232408464
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biblical Literature (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
- Keywords
- parables of the kingdom, Gospel of Matthew, Kingdom of God, C. H. Dodd, New Testament exegesis, parables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
