The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differentiation between Human and Animal Isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum Using rDNA Sequencing and Direct PCR Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Sequence analysis of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified 298-bp region of the Cryptosporidium parvum 18S rRNA gene was carried out on 10 human and 9 animal isolates. Eight of the 9 animal isolates and 3 human isolates displayed the recognition sequence TATATTT, whereas 7/10 human isolates exhibited the recognition sequence TTTTTTTTTTT. Sequence analysis of the ninth animal isolate, which was recovered from a Koala, revealed this isolate to be different from both human and animal isolates. The AT richness of the rDNA recognition sequences rendered them unsuitable for primer design and therefore a diagnostic randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fragment previously developed in our laboratory was also sequenced. Analysis of 2 human and 2 animal isolates again revealed distinct differences between animal and human isolates. On the basis of this sequence information, diagnostic primers were designed that could directly differentiate between animal and human isolates on the basis of the size of the PCR product. The ability to differentiate directly between human and animal isolates has important implications for studies of the transmission and zoonotic potential of this organism. These results also raise further doubts about the uniformity of the species C. parvum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification
Fayer, R., Morgan, U., & Upton, S. J. (2000) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00135-1 · Cited by 938
Self-citationVirulence of Three Distinct Cryptosporidium parvum Isolates for Healthy Adults
Okhuysen, P. C., Chappell, C. L., Crabb, J. H., Sterling, C. R., & DuPont, H. L. (1999) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/315033 · Cited by 466
The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses
Robertson, I. D., Irwin, P. J., Lymbery, A. J., & Thompson, R. C. A. (2000) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00134-x · Cited by 353
Self-citationEnteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats
Robertson, I. D., & Thompson, R. C. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01607-6 · Cited by 226
Self-citationGeneral concepts in zoonotic disease control
Lappin, M. R. (2005) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2004.08.005 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, U. M., Constantine, C. C., Forbes, D. A., & Thompson, R. C. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Parasitology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 825
- ISSN
- 0022-3395 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027933530
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation between Human and Animal Isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum Using rDNA Sequencing and Direct PCR Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3284275
- The paper
- Morgan, U. M., Constantine, C. C., Forbes, D. A., & Thompson, R. C. A. (1997). Differentiation between Human and Animal Isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum Using rDNA Sequencing and Direct PCR Analysis. The Journal of Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.