Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing

Lafford, Barbara A., Connor, Ulla·1997·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

PART 1 PRELIMINARIES: EARLY PHASES OF THE FIELD 1 Toward an extended definition of contrastive rhetoric 2 Contrastive rhetoric studies in applied linguistics 3 Historical evaluation of contrastive rhetoric: from Kaplan's 1966 study to diversification in languages, genres, and authors PART 2 INTERFACES WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES 4 Contrastive rhetoric and the field of rhetoric and composition 5 Contrastive rhetoric and text linguistics 6 Writing as an activity embedded in a culture 7 Contrastive rhetoric and translation studies 8 Genre-specific studies in contrastive rhetoric PART 3 IMPLICATIONS OF CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC 9 Methods of research in contrastive rhetoric 10 Conclusion: Implications and research directions

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/328793

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Lafford, B. A., & Connor, U.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
255
ISSN
0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027663137
Cited by
731
References
0
FWCI
400.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/328793
The paper
Lafford, B. A., & Connor, U. (1997). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/328793

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.