Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,124

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Doing Research on Sensitive Topics

Open access
McCarthy, W., Lee, Raymond M.·1995·Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie

Abstract

Introduction Limits on Inquiry Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Sampling Rare or Deviant Populations Asking Sensitive Questions on Surveys Asking Sensitive Questions Interviewing The Access Process in Research on Sensitive Topics Covert, Adversarial and Collaborative Research Handling Sensitive Data Disclosure and Dissemination in Research on Sensitive Topics Conclusion

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3341018

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,124

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, W., & Lee, R. M.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
280
ISSN
0318-6431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W434304438
Cited by
1,124
References
0
FWCI
87.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3341018
The paper
McCarthy, W., & Lee, R. M. (1995). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.