Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The New Leaders: Guidelines on Leadership Diversity in America

Joseph, Alma M., Morrison, Ann M.·1993·Public Productivity & Management Review

Abstract

Achieving benefits from leadership diversity -- Challenging the barriers to opportunity -- Setting goals for sustained leadership development --Establishing accountability for diversity -- Creating meaningful developme opportunities -- Using recruitment to build diversity -- Step one : discover (and rediscover) diversity problems in your organization -- Step two : strengthen top-management commitment -- Step three : choose solutions that f a balanced strategy -- Step four : demand results and revisitthe goals -- St five : use building blocks to maintain momentum -- Conclusion: Meeting the challenges of leadership diversity -- Appendix: The GOLD research project.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3381052

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Joseph, A. M., & Morrison, A. M.
Venue
Public Productivity & Management Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1993
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
84
ISSN
1044-8039 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1541524506
Cited by
302
References
0
FWCI
38.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Leaders: Guidelines on Leadership Diversity in America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3381052
The paper
Joseph, A. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1993). The New Leaders: Guidelines on Leadership Diversity in America. Public Productivity & Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.