The DOI matches its Crossref record.
"We Chuse to Be Bounded": Native American Animal Husbandry in Colonial New England
Abstract
That which is common to all is proper to none. This savage people ruleth over many lands without title or property; for they inclose no ground, neither have they cattell to maintayne it, but remove their dwellings as they have occasion, or as they can prevail against their neighbours. And why may not christians have liberty to go and dwell amongst them in their waste lands and woods (leaving them such places as they have manured for their corne) as lawfully as Abraham did among the Sodomites? -John Winthrop, General Observations, 1629
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The idea of improvement was quoted time and time again by English colonial leaders in their dealings with the Indigenous populations of the region.
“The idea of improvement would be quoted time and time again by English colonial leaders in their dealings with the Indigenous populations of the region (Silverman, 2003).”
From Dominion and improvement: The moral ecologies of colonial encounters (2024) · cites this paper as Silverman, 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dominion and improvement: The moral ecologies of colonial encounters
Trigg, H. B., & Mrozowski, S. A. (2024) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053241268640 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverman, D. J.
- Venue
- William and Mary Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511
- ISSN
- 0043-5597
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
