Cited by 35Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion and Society Interactions

God, Love, and Health: Findings from a Clinical Study

Levin, Jeff·2001·Review of Religious Research

Abstract

prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3512570

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 33 highest quality studies, six (18%) found worse functioning among those who were more R/S.

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, J.
Corresponding author
Levin, Jeff
Venue
Review of Religious Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2001-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
277
ISSN
0034-673X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155639397
Cited by
35
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Religious Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religion and health, love, spirituality, clinical outcomes, religious beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review