River Otter Predation on Glaucous-Winged Gulls on Mandarte Island, British Columbia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the 22 publications, 13 were secondary anecdotal mentions, six were field-note style publications, and three were primary field research on river otter predation of nesting seabirds.
“Thirteen of these were secondary anecdotal mentions (often just a single sentence) in seabird population studies, six were “field note” style publications, and in just three instances was river otter predation of nesting seabirds an intentional subject of primary field research (Verbeek and Morgan 1978; Quinlan 1983; Carter et al. 2012).”
From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Verbeek and Morgan 1978
Cited by
Sorted by citations
River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America
Stuntz, L., & Orben, R. A. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72118
- Authors
- Verbeek, N. A. M., & Morgan, J. L.
- Venue
- The Murrelet
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 92
- ISSN
- 0027-3716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797568924
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Murrelet (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- river otter, Lutra canadensis, Glaucous-winged Gull, Larus glaucescens, predation, predator-prey interactions, seabirds, Mandarte Island
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
