The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Fitness: A Comparison of Body Condition Indices
Abstract
Behavioral ecologists might often benefit by the ability to directly measure an animal's body condition as an estimate of foraging success, and ultimately fitness. Here we compare the reliability and effectiveness of three indices of body condition that have been heavily used in the morphometrics literature. We examined the ratio index (body mass/body size), the slope-adjusted ratio index (based on regression slopes generated from a reference population), and the residual index (the residuals of a regression of body mass on body size). We present the results of tests performed in the field and laboratory on two ecologically and evolutionarily divergent spider species : the vagrant wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae), and the colonial orb-weaver Metepeira incrassata (Araneae, Araneidae). The ratio index correlated with body size, which weakened the strength of conclusions that could be drawn. The slope-adjusted ratio index requires an independent and large data set with which to generate the expected values, and was likewise sensitive to body size. The residual index, with appropriate transformations to achieve homoscedasticity, was the most reliable index because it did not vary with body size, and we recommend its general use in behavioral studies that require a condition estimate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
Cren, E. D. L. (1951) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/1540 · Cited by 4,308
Thompson, D. W. (2019) · Stripped Bare · doi:10.1515/9780691183978-018 · Cited by 4,177
N., E., & Thompson, D. W. (1945) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2019330 · Cited by 1,119
The selection of suitable indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition
Bolger, T., & Connolly, P. L. (1989) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03300.x · Cited by 1,021
Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology.
Caraco, T., Newman, J. A., Mangel, M., & Clark, C. W. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409517 · Cited by 761
Reist, J. D. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z85-213 · Cited by 544
The Need to Reconsider the Use of Condition Indices in Fishery Science
Cone, R. S. (1989) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1989)118<0511:tntrtu>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 331
Approaches to Primate Paleobiology.
Schwartz, J. H., & Szalay, F. S. (1975) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412727 · Cited by 193
Clutch Size in Spiders: Is More Better?
Marshall, S. D., & Gittleman, J. L. (1994) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2390120 · Cited by 187
Self-citationFemale sexual response to condition-dependent ornaments in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata
Nicoletto, P. F. (1993) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1213 · Cited by 134
Behavior and Ecological Interactions of Larval Odonata
Pierce, C. L., Crowley, P. H., & Johnson, D. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938013 · Cited by 131
Physiological Condition of Autumn-Banded Mallards and Its Relationship to Hunting Vulnerability
Hepp, G. R., Blohm, R. J., Reynolds, R. E., Hines, J. E., & Nichols, J. D. (1986) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801893 · Cited by 128
Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk
Jakob, E. M. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80908-x · Cited by 89
Self-citationEnergy Budgets in Free‐Living Green Iguanas in a Seasonal Environment
Lichtenbelt, W. D. V. M., Wesselingh, R. A., Vogel, J. T., & Albers, K. B. M. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940486 · Cited by 66
Thorpe, K. E., Taylor, A. C., & Huntingford, F. A. (1995) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80019-0 · Cited by 57
Renouf, D., Gales, R., & Noseworthy, E. (1993) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02703.x · Cited by 29
Diet and condition of bobcats, Lynx rufus, in Nova Scotia during autumn and winter
Matlack, C. R., & Evans, A. J. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z92-156 · Cited by 27
Hamer, K. C., & Furness, R. W. (1993) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02668.x · Cited by 20
Cited by
Peig, J., & Green, A. J. (2009) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x · Cited by 1,906
MASS/LENGTH RESIDUALS: MEASURES OF BODY CONDITION OR GENERATORS OF SPURIOUS RESULTS?
Green, A. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1473:mlrmob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 895
The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length
Peig, J., & Green, A. J. (2010) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x · Cited by 706
Cotton, S., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2688 · Cited by 625
On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance
García‐Berthou, E. (2001) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00524.x · Cited by 510
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakob, E. M., Marshall, S. D., & Uetz, G. W.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009322869
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
