The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Temporal Dynamics of Institutionalization
Abstract
In this article we reexamine the relationship between time and processes of institutionalization. We argue that pace and stability, two temporal dimensions of institutionalization, depend on the mechanism used by agents to support the institutionalization process. Drawing from the power literature, we develop four types of mechanisms—influence, force, discipline, and domination—and argue that (1) each type will produce a distinctive pattern of pace and stability, and (2) more complex patterns of pace and stability will result from the combined use of multiple mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
The antecedents of deinstitutionalization
Oliver, C. (1992) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069201300403 · Cited by 1,746 · cited 1×
“A second implication of this article involves the issue of deinstitutionalization (Oliver, 1992).”
Background
Cited by
Institutions and Institutional Work
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006) · The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies · doi:10.4135/9781848608030.n7 · Cited by 3,338
Self-citationINSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN EMERGING FIELDS: HIV/AIDS TREATMENT ADVOCACY IN CANADA.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159610 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationAncona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/3560246 · Cited by 870
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Wijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0218 · Cited by 459
Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model
Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002 · Cited by 411
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Pillai, K. G., Nair, S. R., Zahoor, N., & Khan, Z. (2024) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-024-00547-3 · Cited by 8
“Thus, institutions dictate the behaviour and strategic choices of organisations, making any deviations from acceptable institutional practices potentially costly for firms in terms of higher transaction costs (Lawrence et al., 2001; Peng, 2003 ).”
오석영 (2013) · The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.4.005 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156287990
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
