Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Misunderstanding in Clinical Research: Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception, Therapeutic Misestimation, & Therapeutic Optimism

Horng, Sam, Grady, Christine·2003·IRB: Ethics and Human Research
DOI 10.2307/3564408
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sam Horng, Christine Grady, Misunderstanding in Clinical Research: Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception, Therapeutic Misestimation, & Therapeutic Optimism, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 2003), pp. 11-16

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3564408

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Horng, S., & Grady, C.
Venue
IRB: Ethics and Human Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
11
ISSN
0193-7758
DOI
10.2307/3564408
Cited by
243
References
15

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misunderstanding in Clinical Research: Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception, Therapeutic Misestimation, & Therapeutic Optimism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3564408
The paper
Horng, S., & Grady, C. (2003). Misunderstanding in Clinical Research: Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception, Therapeutic Misestimation, & Therapeutic Optimism. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3564408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.