Cited by 99Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

On the Influence of the Arctic Fox Alopex lagopus on the Distribution of Arctic Birds

Larson, Sten·1960·Oikos

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3564688

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arctic foxes and polar bears often overlap in habitat use with nesting seabirds at islands and mainland sites throughout the Arctic, where they will occasionally forage on eggs, chicks, and adult seabirds.

    “For example, arctic foxes ( Vulpes lagopus ) (e.g., Larson 1960; Eide et al. 2005) and polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ) (e.g., Stempniewicz 1993; Dey et al. 2020) often overlap in habitat use with nesting seabirds at islands and mainland sites throughout the Arctic, where they will occasionally forage on eggs, chicks, and adult seabirds.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larson, S.
Corresponding author
Larson, Sten
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1960
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
276
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314061622
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oikos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
arctic fox, Arctic birds, bird distribution, predator-prey interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review