Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Defence and Regrowth, Alternative Plant Strategies in the Struggle against Herbivores

van der Meijden, Ed, Wijn, Marijke, Verkaar, Henricus J.·1988·Oikos

Abstract

Differences in intensity or frequency of defoliation between species do not necessarily imply differences in ultimate effect: survival or growth. Several species appear to be very successful to overcome a high defoliation pressure because of their regrowth capacity. The hypothesis is formulated that defence mechanisms and regrowth capacity are alternatives. Given a limited amount of energy and nutrients available in the struggle against herbivores, there should be a trade off between these two mechanisms. Observations on the intensity of herbivory, experiments on regrowth capacity and on storage of reserves in roots agree with the predictions based on this hypothesis. Herbivory theory is discussed and it is concluded that a short population longevity and/or a short life cycle may be one of the ways to reduce the effect of herbivory. Differences in shoot/root ratio are discussed in this context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3565318

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M., & Verkaar, H. J.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-03
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
355
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326894023
Cited by
460
References
0
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defence and Regrowth, Alternative Plant Strategies in the Struggle against Herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565318
The paper
van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M., & Verkaar, H. J. (1988). Defence and Regrowth, Alternative Plant Strategies in the Struggle against Herbivores. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.