The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemistry of DNA Lesions
Abstract
Ionizing radiation produces a range of damage types in cellular DNA. All damage types do not have the same biological significance. Here arguments are presented supporting the view that lesions in which damage is present on both strands in a local region of the DNA (locally multiply damaged sites--LMDS) will present problems for cellular repair processes. We have previously shown that lesions produced in DNA by individual OH radicals, i.e., single OH species acting alone, are ineffective in mammalian cell killing [J.F. Ward, W.F. Blakely, and E.I. Joner, Radiat. Res. 103, 383-392 (1985)]. We have similar evidence in mutagenesis studies (Ward and Calabro-Jones, unpublished data). Thus the formation of such damage by individual OH radicals formed by ionizing radiation would be similarly ineffectual. Earlier [J.F. Ward, Radiat. Res. 86, 185-195 (1981)] we suggested that OH-radical scavenging studies were consistent with the scavenging of OH radicals in volumes of high radical density, spurs, etc., i.e., in volumes which, when they overlap the DNA, will cause the production of LMDS. The individual constituent lesions of LMDS will be formed as a result of direct ionization or as a result of an OH-radical attack. Both mechanisms can lead to base damage or strand breakage. It is clear that damage in both bases of a deoxyribonucleotide pair leads to loss of base sequence information and can be repaired correctly only by accident or in a recombinational process.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species in cancer
Liou, G.-Y., & Storz, P. (2010) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.3109/10715761003667554 · Cited by 3,382
Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells
Diehn, M., Cho, R. W., Lobo, N. A., Kalisky, T., Dorie, M. J., Kulp, A. N., Qian, D., Lam, J. S., Ailles, L. E., Wong, M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07733 · Cited by 2,555
Reactions of oxyl radicals with DNA
Breen, A. P., & Murphy, J. A. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00209-3 · Cited by 1,038
The Complexity of DNA Damage: Relevance to Biological Consequences
Ward, J. F. (1994) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553009414551401 · Cited by 633
Self-citationGasch, A. P., Huang, M., Metzner, S., Botstein, D., Elledge, S. J., & Brown, P. O. (2001) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.12.10.2987 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward, J. F.
- Venue
- Radiation Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- S103
- ISSN
- 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004498595
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemistry of DNA Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3576637
- The paper
- Ward, J. F. (1985). Biochemistry of DNA Lesions. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3576637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.