The Complexity of DNA Damage: Relevance to Biological Consequences
Abstract
Ionizing radiation causes both singly and multiply damaged sites in DNA when the range of radical migration is limited by the presence of hydroxyl radical scavengers (e.g. within cells). Multiply damaged sites are considered to be more biologically relevant because of the challenges they present to cellular repair mechanisms. These sites occur in the form of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) but also as other multiple damages that can be converted to dsb during attempted repair. The presence of a dsb can lead to loss of base sequence information and/or can permit the two ends of a break to separate and rejoin with the wrong partner. (Multiply damaged sites may also be the biologically relevant type of damage caused by other agents, such as UVA, B and/or C light, and some antitumour antibiotics.) The quantitative data available from radiation studies of DNA are shown to support the proposed mechanisms for the production of complex damage in cellular DNA, i.e. via scavengable and non-scavengable mechanisms. The yields of complex damages can in turn be used to support the conclusion that cellular mutations are a consequence of the presence of these damages within a gene. Literature data are used to support these statements and to develop overall mechanisms connecting the production of primary species to the production of biologically relevant damages. The consequences of the LET of the radiation on multiplicity of damage are discussed and suggestions made for the cause of the decre…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DNA damage is a good indicator of radiation clustering properties and therefore of radiation quality.
“Albeit not exhaustive of cellular endpoints, DNA damage is here chosen as a good indicator of radiation clustering properties and therefore of radiation quality.”
From The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139
Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S., & Bonner, W. M. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858 · Cited by 5,438 · see citing works
Hematologic consequences of exposure to ionizing radiation
Dainiak, N. (2002) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00802-0 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Oxidatively generated complex DNA damage: Tandem and clustered lesions
Cadet, J., Ravanat, J.-L., TavernaPorro, M., Menoni, H., & Angelov, D. (2012) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.005 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Pathways for repairing and tolerating the spectrum of oxidative DNA lesions
Berquist, B. R., & Wilson, D. M. (2012) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.02.001 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Human Telomeres Are Hypersensitive to UV-Induced DNA Damage and Refractory to Repair
Rochette, P. J., & Brash, D. E. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000926 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy
Baiocco, G., Barbieri, S., Babini, G., Morini, J., Alloni, D., Friedland, W., Kundrát, P., Schmitt, E., Puchalska, M., Sihver, L., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34033 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Genome-wide mapping of genomic DNA damage: methods and implications
Amente, S., Scala, G., Majello, B., Azmoun, S., Tempest, H. G., Premi, S., & Cooke, M. S. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03923-6 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ward, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ward, J.F.
- ORCID
- Ward, J.F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-432
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W2068449224
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Cancer Institute (CA-46295, R01CA046295)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Keywords
- DNA damage, ionizing radiation, DNA double-strand breaks, hydroxyl radical scavengers, DNA repair, radiation-induced mutations, LET, oxygen enhancement ratio, UVA, antitumor antibiotics
- MeSH terms
- DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Mutation, Oxygen, Hydroxyl Radical, Linear Energy Transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review