The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An ESL Index of Development
Abstract
This paper is a report on the progress we are making in an attempt to establish a second language acquisition index of development. Such an index would be a developmental yardstick by which researchers could expediently and reliably gauge a learner's proficiency in a second language. Encouraged by the findings of an earlier pilot study, a more ambitious project involving the analysis of 212 compositions was undertaken. These compositions, written by university ESL students, were analyzed using several measures based on Kellogg Hunt's T-unit performance variable. Two measures applied in the analysis, the percentage of error-free T-units and the average length of error-free T-units, proved to be the best discriminators among the five levels of ESL proficiency represented in this population. In addition to a discussion of these results, included in this paper is a survey of L2 acquisition studies which have also employed T-unit length as a proficiency measure. Finally, an outline is offered of the studies currently being conducted in an attempt to further refine these measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005 · Cited by 474
Planning and Interlanguage Variation
Crookes, G. (1989) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100008391 · Cited by 431
Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine‐Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices
KYLE, K., & CROSSLEY, S. A. (2018) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12468 · Cited by 405
MEASURING LONGITUDINAL WRITING DEVELOPMENT USING INDICES OF SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY AND SOPHISTICATION
Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Verspoor, M. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000546 · Cited by 83
Dynamic Development in Speaking Versus Writing in Identical Twins
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12107 · Cited by 68
An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development
Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016) · Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/dujal.5.1.04loe · Cited by 18
L2 language development in oral and written modalities
Son, M. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000329 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen-Freeman, D.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083536748
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.