Cited by 431EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Planning and Interlanguage Variation

Crookes, Graham·1989·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

Having focused previously on attention, cognitively oriented investigations of interlanguage variation and development are turning toward other possible explanatory variables, such as planning. The present study reports on an experiment in which two groups of 20 Japanese learners of English as a second language performed two monologic production tasks with and without time for planning. It was found that providing learners with time to plan their utterances results in interlanguage productions which are more complex in the short run.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100008391

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crookes (1989) reported that providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.

    “Crookes (1989) reported a study in which providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)

  • Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures, and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.

    “Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures (target-like use of the article system and of plural -s), and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)

  • In Crookes (1989), standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways.

    “the standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)

  • Crookes (1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.

    “The most comparable study (Crookes, 1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes, 1989

  • These results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.

    “First, these results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.”

    From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crookes, G.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Crookes, Graham
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
1989-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
367-383
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W2163170109
Cited by
431
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
46.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
interlanguage variation, planning, utterance planning, Japanese learners of English, second language production, utterance complexity, second language development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review