Planning and Interlanguage Variation
Abstract
Having focused previously on attention, cognitively oriented investigations of interlanguage variation and development are turning toward other possible explanatory variables, such as planning. The present study reports on an experiment in which two groups of 20 Japanese learners of English as a second language performed two monologic production tasks with and without time for planning. It was found that providing learners with time to plan their utterances results in interlanguage productions which are more complex in the short run.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crookes (1989) reported that providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.
“Crookes (1989) reported a study in which providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures, and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.
“Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures (target-like use of the article system and of plural -s), and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
In Crookes (1989), standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways.
“the standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
Crookes (1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.
“The most comparable study (Crookes, 1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes, 1989
These results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.
“First, these results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
The evidence on the influence of planning on accuracy is mixed.
“First of all, we need to recall that the evidence on the influence of planning on accuracy is mixed.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes, 1989
Crookes' (1989) tasks, such as a LEGO assembly, were classroom tasks and did not have much connection with the subjects' real lives.
“Crookes' (1989) tasks, for example, a LEGO assembly, were classroom tasks and did not have much connection with the subjects' real lives.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes' (1989)
Crookes' tasks were devices for the transmission of neutral and arbitrary information.
“They were, quite simply, devices for the transmission of neutral and arbitrary information.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes' (1989)
Consistent with Crookes (1989), complexity became the preeminent goal under detailed planning, but accuracy suffered to some degree, reducing to a point midway between the undetailed and nonplanning conditions for the Personal task, below the no planning conditions for the Narrative task, and only slightly inferior to the undetailed planning for the Decision task.
“Consistent with Crookes (1989), complexity became the preeminent goal, but accuracy suffered to some degree, reducing to a point midway between the undetailed and nonplanning conditions for the Personal task, below the no planning conditions for the Narrative task, and only slightly inferior to the undetailed planning for the Decision task.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
Crookes (1989) seemed to be testing for specific increases in accuracy, whereas the present study was more interested in detecting a more generalized accuracy effect.
“Crookes (1989) seemed to be testing for specific increases in accuracy, whereas we were more interested in detecting a more generalized accuracy effect.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
Crookes (1989) looked for specific effects on a wide range of variables, whereas the present study used a more global measure based on all contributory influences on error and correctness.
“Crookes (1989) looked for specific effects on a wide range of variables, whereas the present study used a more global measure based on all contributory influences on error and correctness.”
From The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance (1996) · cites this paper as Crookes (1989)
Cites
MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer.
O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.316 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/136216899672186140 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400303 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Wang, Z. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.02wan · Cited by 164 · see citing works
- Authors
- Crookes, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crookes, Graham
- ORCID
- Crookes, Graham
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-383
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2163170109
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 46.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- interlanguage variation, planning, utterance planning, Japanese learners of English, second language production, utterance complexity, second language development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review