The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom
Abstract
Surveys of academic writing have an important role to play in providing a more complete picture of writing than the “process” approach has given us. However, previous academic writing surveys have not satisfactorily answered the question of just what kinds of academic writing tasks are typical. Without such information, creating realistic writing tasks in the English-for-academic-purposes (EAP) classroom remains largely a matter of guesswork. The present study attempts to fill this gap, taking as its data the actual handouts in university classes. The tasks were classified into seven categories, which are described. The implications of the controlled nature of many of the writing tasks are discussed, and ways to put these findings into use in the EAP classroom are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, C. R. (1984) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335638409383686 · Cited by 2,907
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Students' Perceptions of EAP Writing Instruction and Writing Needs Across the Disciplines
Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587199 · Cited by 389
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.65 · Cited by 156
Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing
Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Horowitz, D. M.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 445
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993642802
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 151.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.