The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects on Reading Comprehension of Language Complexity and Cultural Background of a Text
Abstract
complexity of the text and the cultural origin of the story affected comprehension. The native language readers were better able to understand unadapted English and the story based on American folklore. Implications of this study for teaching and for materials selection and design are discussed. The effects of the language complexity and the culturally determined background of a text on reading comprehension have always been recognized as elements of concern in the selection of reading materials for foreign language learners and in the evaluation of their reading comprehension. Research with native language readers has shown that the amount of language complexity has less effect on reading comprehension than the organization of ideas in the passage. Schlesinger (1968) found that the length and structure of English sentences had no effect on comprehension of readers who tended to use lexical meanings to understand the sentences. Meyer's work (1975) showed that organization in English prose influenced what idea units were recalled from a passage by native language readers, but there were no significant differences between recall of units with and without the presence of linguistic cues. In their discussions of the problems in reading comprehension of ESL
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) · Cited by 466
Content and Formal Schemata in ESL Reading
Carrell, P. L. (1987) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586498 · Cited by 404
Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading
Alptekin, C. (2006) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.003 · Cited by 154
Background Knowledge, Linguistic Complexity, and Second-Language Reading Comprehension
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (1998) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862969809547998 · Cited by 138
Lee, S. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x · Cited by 131
The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension
Erten, İ. H., & Razı, S. (2009) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66632 · Cited by 93
“Schema theory deals with “preexisting knowledge structures stored in the mind” (Nassaji, 2002, p. 444) and how readers combine their previous knowledge with the text (Ajideh, 2003; Alderson, 2000; Alptekin, 2006; Anderson, 1999; Carrell, 1983; Carrell & Eisterhold, 1983; Grabe & Stoller, 2002; Johnson, 1981, 1982; Ket…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, P.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026840525
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.