The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Listening Comprehension: Approach, Design, Procedure
Abstract
This article outlines three dimensions in the teaching of listening comprehension. In approach, it discusses the nature of spoken discourse and offers a theory of listening comprehension that takes into account the processes that listeners make use of. In design, it analyzes learners' listening needs, proposes a taxonomy of microskills, and establishes objectives for teaching these skills. And finally, in procedure, it presents classroom activities and exercise types that can be used to attain these objectives. Not to let a word get in the way of its sentence Nor to let a sentence get in the way of its intention, But to send your mind out to meet the intention as a guest; THAT is understanding. Chinese proverb, fourth century B.C. In this article, three dimensions of conceptualization, planning, and performance involved in the teaching of listening comprehension are considered. These are referred to as approach, design, and procedure (Richards and Rodgers 1982). Initially, an outline of some of what is known about the processes involved in listening is presented. This is the level of approach, where assumptions about how listeners proceed in decoding utterances to extract meanings are spelled out. The next level, that of design, is where an operationalization is made of the component micro-skills which constitute our competence as listeners. This in turn enables objectives to be defined for the teaching of listening comprehension. At the third level, that of procedure, questions concerning exercise types and teaching techniques are examined. These three levels illustrate the domain of methodology in language teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategy Instruction in Listening for Lower‐Intermediate Learners of French
Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x · Cited by 368
Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English
Steedman, M. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414385 · Cited by 358
Listening in the language classroom
Field, J. (2010) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccq026 · Cited by 296
Can Strategy Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension?
Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, J. C.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007887579
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Listening Comprehension: Approach, Design, Procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3586651
- The paper
- Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening Comprehension: Approach, Design, Procedure. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.