The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain
Abstract
Theories of second language acquisition (SLA) are attempts to explain well-attested empirical findings about relationships between process and product in interlanguage development and universals, and variance in learners and learning environments. An important component of such theories will be one or more mechanisms to account for interlanguage change. While theories differ in scope and so often relate only to partial descriptions, they must account for major accepted findings within their domains if they are to be credible. Identification of “accepted findings,” therefore, is an important part of theory construction and evaluation. Such findings will be the least an SLA theory needs to explain. Sample accepted findings on learners, environments, and interlanguages are proposed along with some implications for current SLA theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
Maturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090 · cited 1×
“older starters can achieve (Long, 1990).”
Self-citationAge, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586451 · Cited by 581
Self-citationPlanning and Interlanguage Variation
Crookes, G. (1989) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100008391 · Cited by 431
Cited by
Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. (1997) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/18.2.141 · Cited by 1,484
Pica, T. (1994) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x · Cited by 1,200
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866
Self-citationPica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587607 · Cited by 302
Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults
STEVENS, G. (1999) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404599004030 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, M. H.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040866241
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3587113
- The paper
- Long, M. H. (1990). The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.