Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain

Long, Michael H.·1990·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

Theories of second language acquisition (SLA) are attempts to explain well-attested empirical findings about relationships between process and product in interlanguage development and universals, and variance in learners and learning environments. An important component of such theories will be one or more mechanisms to account for interlanguage change. While theories differ in scope and so often relate only to partial descriptions, they must account for major accepted findings within their domains if they are to be credible. Identification of “accepted findings,” therefore, is an important part of theory construction and evaluation. Such findings will be the least an SLA theory needs to explain. Sample accepted findings on learners, environments, and interlanguages are proposed along with some implications for current SLA theories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3587113

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Long, M. H.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
649
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040866241
Cited by
203
References
4
FWCI
35.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3587113
The paper
Long, M. H. (1990). The Least a Second Language Acquisition Theory Needs to Explain. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.