Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158Digital Communication and LanguageEnglish Language Learning and TeachingLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protean Communication: The Language of Computer-Mediated Communication

Murray, Denise E.·2000·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

Computer-mediated communication (CMC), which began in proprietary companies two decades ago, has developed into a worldwide medium of communication that ESOL learners encounter inside and outside the classroom. Because learners' participation in CMC is likely to increase in the coming years, it is important for TESOL professionals to understand the norms of language use developed by CMC-based speech communities. Research has found that CMC exhibits features of simplified registers associated with both oral and written language. It also exhibits its own norms for organizing conversation and accommodating threads of discourse. CMC, however, cannot be studied as a neutral linguistic phenomenon; instead, researchers and educators need to examine how CMC influences the dominance of English, access to knowledge and power, and equity in discourse. Distance learning, an application of CMC that has begun and will continue to serve a role in English language teaching and in ESOL teacher education, is an area in which these issues are relevant. CMC should be viewed not in terms of its functionality but in terms of the ways in which users shape a new medium of communication to fit the needs of their speech community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3587737

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register

    FERRARA, K., BRUNNER, H., & WHITTEMORE, G. (1991) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088391008001002 · Cited by 496 · cited 2×

    “, Davis & Brewer, 1997; Ferrara et al., 1991; D. E. Murray, 1991) have not found evidence of these emotional outbursts, attributing the different findings to differences in the speech communities studied. However, Herring, who has conducted a variety of studies on gender and CMC, including linguistic analyses (1996c)…”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Murray, D. E.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Murray, Denise E.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
397
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048990840
Cited by
158
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
computer-mediated communication, speech communities, language norms, discourse structure, distance education, English language teaching, TESOL

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.