Cited by 455Multilingual Education and PolicyEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The Idealised Native Speaker, Reified Ethnicities, and Classroom Realities

Leung, Constant, Harris, Roxy, Rampton, Ben·1997·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

TESOL practice in the schooling sector in England has implicitly assumed that ESL students are linguistic and social outsiders and that there is a neat one-to-one correspondence between ethnicity and language. This perspective has tended to conceptualise L2 learners as a linguistically diverse group (from non-English-speaking backgrounds) but with similar language learning needs. However, demographic and social changes in the past 30 years have rendered such assumptions inadequate and misleading, particularly in multiethnic urban areas. In this article we seek to (a) offer an alternative account of the classroom realities in contemporary multilingual schools where the linguistic profiles and language learning needs of ESL students are not easily understood in terms of fixed concepts of ethnicity and language; (b) draw on recent developments in cultural theory to clarify the shifting and changing relationship among ethnicity, social identity, and language use in the context of postcolonial diaspora; and (c) question the pedagogical relevance of the notion of native speaker and propose that instead TESOL professionals should be concerned with questions about language expertise, language inheritance, and language affiliation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3587837

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sociolinguists have long contested the idealisation of native speakers, regarding it as impossible to reconcile with the facts of linguistic diversity, mixed language and multilingualism.

    “But sociolinguists have long contested this idealisation, regarding it as impossible to reconcile with the facts of linguistic diversity, mixed language and multilingualism (Ferguson 1982, Leung, Harris, andRampton 1997).”

    From Language and Superdiversity (2015) · cites this paper as Leung, Harris, and Rampton 1997

  • Poststructuralist ideas have been working their way through applied linguistics.

    “Poststructuralist ideas have also been working their way through applied linguistics”

    From Language and Superdiversity (2015) · cites this paper as Leung, Harris, and Rampton 1997

  • There is now growing discussion of whether and how contemporary developments in language, ethnicity and culture require new forms of intervention.

    “there is now growing discussion of whether and how contemporary developments in language, ethnicity and culture require new forms of intervention (Leung, Harris, and Rampton 1997, Pennycook 2001, Pennycook 2010, Rampton 2000)”

    From Language and Superdiversity (2015) · cites this paper as Leung, Harris, and Rampton 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B.
Affiliations
University of West London (GB)
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
543
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043733992
Cited by
455
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
38.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
native speaker ideal, language and ethnicity, ESL learners, multilingual schools, language learning needs, social identity, postcolonial diaspora, language expertise, language inheritance, language affiliation, linguistic diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review